Home >> Cameras and Photography: Camera Lenses
Nikon Nikkor 70-300mm F4.0-5.6 D-AF ED Lens
Nikon Nikkor 70-300mm F4.0-5.6 D-AF ED Lens

Product Rating
4.15 of 5
89 reviews

Price Range
$225 - $674

Product Description

Professional photographers make Nikkor lenses their lenses of choice. Nikon is committed to every aspect of lens manufacturing, maintaining clarity, sharpness, focusing accuracy, range and reliability.PRODUCT FEATURES:High-powered 4.3X telephoto zoom lens;Rotating zoom ring;ED glass for high resolution and high contrast even at maximum apertures.


Product Reviews
Sort By :
<< first < prev 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | >   >> 

Overall Rating :

Value Rating :

Written By

Ryan Pierce

From

Pittsburgh, PA

Date Created

01/25/2002

Summary

I''ve had this lens for about a year and I really like it. I shot sunsets at two locations last summer and got great results. The color reproduction is beautiful, and it is quite sharp stopped down, even at 300mm. You also can''t beat the 300mm focal length. You can''t get this range in any other Nikon zoom, regardless of price. This is an outdoor lens, because it is so slow that you can rarely shoot with available light indoors. A tripod doesn''t help you either, if the subject is moving. For that reason, I can''t effectively use this lens to photograph my son''s sports (baseball, basketball, and football). I just can''t get shutter speeds fast enough (even outdoors in the evening), to stop action - especially at f5.6 for the long end. For that reason, I am either going to get the 80-200 f2.8, or the 180 f2.8 to supplement this lens. I will keep this lens, however, for its flexible use while traveling, and when weight/size is an issue.

Strength

Nice color rendition. Light, solid enough construction, nice handling. Size is just right for traveling. Can''t beat 300mm focal length for pulling power in a sub $1,000 lens. Sharp enough stopped down to f8.

Weakness

Not as sharp as a pro lens wide open, but acceptable to me, as I give more weight to composition and color than to sharpness. Way too slow for sports. Focuses a little slow.
Visitors rate this review 2.50 out of 5 after 2 votes
Rate this review:

Overall Rating :

Value Rating :

Written By

Fisho

From

Singapore

Date Created

01/22/2002

Summary

I was initially skeptical about the performance of this lens after using mostly Nikkor Primes and the excellent Voigtlander Rangefinder system but after shooting with it and seeing the results I can easily recommend it to anyone who needs a long zoom on a budget. Sharpness and contrast on print film was exceptional. If you are happy with the Nikkor 28-105 then this lens is the perfect compliment. At the 300mm end, your sharpness will be determined by how steady you can hold this lens. If you put it o a tripod and stop down to f8 or 11, I dare you tell the difference between pics taken with this lens and a pro f2.8 lens.

Strength

Weight. Value for money.

Weakness

Build quality.
Visitors rate this review 4.00 out of 5 after 1 votes
Rate this review:

Overall Rating :

Value Rating :

Written By

Anand Raghavan

From

Columbus, OH, USA

Date Created

01/15/2002

Summary

I bought this lens after I bought my 28-105mm Nikkor. It is a good lens but I am having problems with it. Everytime it takes 3-4 tries to mount the lens onto my Nikon N80. I keep getting an F-EE error on my viewfinder ( I do lock it at the highest f-stop number).

Strength

None, Nikon''s legendary quality is going down (in my opinion). They are charging top dollar for their products but are not delivering.

Weakness

Very light, flimsy build, seems cheap to hold. Nikon is going down the tubes by selling this lens to people.
Visitors rate this review 1.69 out of 5 after 13 votes
Rate this review:

Overall Rating :

Value Rating :

Written By

Gary

From

Denver, CO

Date Created

12/18/2001

Summary

I originally purchased this lens to use on backcountry mountaineering trips where weight is an issue. The sharpness is quite good, in my opinion, when using color slide film, especially in the 70-135 range. I have also gotten good results in the 200-300 range when used stopped-down on a tripod. Deciding to do some subjective testing on my own, I directly compared this zoom at 200 and 300 mm to my old Nikkor 200 f/4 and 300 f/4.5 lenses (non-ED) outdoors on a tripod. Shooting identical scenes stopped-down to f8-11, I couldn''t detect any appreciable difference in the sharpness of slides at 200 mm, while at 300 mm the zoom was slightly softer than the fixed lens. Color saturation, however, was noticeably better with the zoom at both focal lengths. As a result, I prefer the images made with the zoom. I have been very happy with the performance of this lens, especially when you factor in the size, weight, and price.

Strength

Sharp Price, size, and weight

Weakness

Somewhat slow Build quality less than manual focus lenses
Visitors rate this review 4.40 out of 5 after 5 votes
Rate this review:

Overall Rating :

Value Rating :

Written By

solidair

From

Athens, Greece

Date Created

11/26/2001

Summary

Good starter lense....but loses it''s charm when trying to take low light shots even with a faster film. Nice range 70-300 but the cost is the speed and sharpness over 200mm. Nice price but that becomes less important when the camera shake spoils those candid shots in low light.

Strength

Great travel companion in bright conditions. Light and good range.

Weakness

SLOW - I missed too many late afternoon candid shots due to camera shake. Not too sharp over 200mm
Visitors rate this review 2.86 out of 5 after 7 votes
Rate this review:
Sort By
<< first < prev 4 | 5 | 77 | 8 | 9 | 10 | >   >> 
 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com

Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda